Pelosi’s Bluff Called

January 8, 2020 – Imagine if a district attorney charged you with wrongdoing, then let the charges hang over you indefinitely?

That’s the stunt House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been pulling, sitting on the articles of impeachment against President Trump since Dec. 18 with zero regard for the Constitution.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham accuses House Democrats of “trying to hold these articles over the head of the president,” denying him a chance to be acquitted.

Graham says that “if we don’t get the articles this week,” senators should “deem” the impeachment articles “delivered to the Senate” so the trial can begin.

Monday, freshman Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri asked what’s to stop Pelosi from holding the ­articles indefinitely. “If Americans are sick of this impeachment saga, this partisan circus now,” think how they will feel months, or even a year, from now.

Hawley is proposing a 25-day deadline. If the House fails to ­deliver the articles and name a ­legal team by then, he says, the Senate should vote to dismiss the charges.

Hawley and Graham are rightly fed up, but Graham’s proposal is the better one. The president and the nation deserve a verdict, not just a dismissal.

To get it done, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will have to drop the fiction that the Senate is still a place for bipartisan civility. It’s time for a reality check.

In a previous era, when senators prided themselves on bipartisanship, the Senate established a ­requirement for a ²/₃ majority to consider any rules changes. Republicans and Democrats would have to agree. That can’t happen this time. Republicans have a bare 53 votes, and no Democrat is likely to support a rules change.

McConnell blasted Pelosi Monday for treating impeachment like a “frivolous game.” To outmaneuver her, McConnell will have to resort to a parliamentary device, known as the “nuclear option,” which ­requires only a simple ­majority. He used it before to prevent Democrats from blocking Trump’s ­judicial and executive-branch nominees. The stakes are higher now: a timely trial for the commander in chief.

The trial will begin, according to McConnell, with House Democrats arguing their case, followed by a rebuttal from White House lawyers. At that point — not ­before — senators will decide whether to call witnesses or proceed to a verdict. It’s the same plan unanimously adopted by the Senate for the trial of President Bill Clinton.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is demanding an upfront guarantee of White House witnesses, knowing he won’t get it. It’s a PR stunt to smear Trump’s ­expected acquittal as “unfair,” damaging him for his reelection bid.

Some Republicans would like to call the Bidens. Reuters reports that, according to a former member of the Ukrainian parliament, Hunter Biden was hired as a ­director of Burisma to protect the company from investigation, when Vice President Joe Biden was the US point person on Ukraine.

Democrats applauded Monday when former National Security Adviser John Bolton announced he would testify if called. Predictably, Never Trump-ish Sen. Mitt Romney, still smarting from Trump’s bypassing him for the secretary of state job, ­immediately said he’d like to hear from Bolton. But centrists Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski are sticking with McConnell’s plan, which postpones the witnesses question until after opening arguments.

That’s wise, because the key ­issue facing senators is whether the charges against Trump are ­impeachable offenses. For the first time in history, the House ­impeached a president without accusing him of breaking any law. Democrats insist they can nail Trump for “exercising power with a corrupt purpose, even if his ­action would otherwise be permissible.” Putting political advantage above the national interest.

By that definition, every politician is guilty. Expect a majority of senators, including some Democrats perhaps, to see the danger of such flimflam charges.

By the end of January, the Senate will have voted to acquit President Trump. Pelosi and her party will be the big losers. They ­impeached a president for partisan gain, and then tried to delay the trial, in a desperate search for evidence to make the charges stick. Voters are likely to judge them harshly in November.

Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York.

Recent Articles

Archives

Recent Posts

Archives